Dismissed

Pramod Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Jun 2023CR. MISC./3211/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna rejected the petitioner's bail application in a kidnapping case involving sections 363 and 366 IPC. The court found the allegations grave and inclined against granting bail despite the petitioner's claim of false implication. Directions were issued to conclude the trial expeditiously.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for bail stands rejected. Trial directed to be concluded expeditiously.

Pramod Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3211 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-286 Year-2022 Thana- LADANIA District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

PRAMOD KUMAR YADAV Son of Ram Sevak Yadav @ Bhutai Yadav Resident of Village- Chiknautwa (Chiknotba), P.S.- Ladaniya, DistrictMadhubani

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Md. Soban Asghar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 21-06-2023

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 363 and 366 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

The allegation against the petitioner is of kidnapping the daughter of the informant.

¶15

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. He submitted that victim is a matured girl, who is aged about 21 years. There is no eye-witness to show petitioner has involved in the said occurrence. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 15.10.2022.

¶16

Learned APP for the State has opposed the application for bail and submitted that petitioner is named in the FIR. The

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3211 of 2023(3) dt.21-06-2023 2/2

¶18

victim girl has recovered and her statement recorded u/s 164 of the Cr.P.C., in which she stated that the petitioner taken away her in a Car, thereafter kept her in a house and committed rape upon her and when she protested, the petitioner assaulted to her. During investigation several witnesses have also supported the prosecution case.

¶19

Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of allegation, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and, as such, his prayer for bail stands rejected.

¶20

The trial Court is directed to conclude the trial expeditiously.

¶21

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶22

arish/-

¶23

U T

Pramod Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pramod Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lalan Das Vs The State of Bihar

Raj Narayan Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Akhlak @ Md. Akhlak Ansari Vs The State of Bihar

Arun Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Sukhdev Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Dilkhush Kumar Vs The State of Bihar