Allowed

Akhlak @ Md. Akhlak Ansari v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Jun 2023CR. MISC./4278/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar granted regular bail to the petitioner in a kidnapping case instituted under Section 364(A) IPC, directing furnishing of a bail bond and sureties to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnia.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnia.

Akhlak @ Md. Akhlak Ansari Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4278 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-748 Year-2022 Thana- PURNEA SADAR District- Purnia

¶3

======================================================

¶4

AKHLAK @ MD. AKHLAK ANSARI S/o Akmal @ Afzal Ansari R/o Village- Kanharia, P.S.- Dagarua, Distt- Purnia.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Md. Helal Ahmad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Suresh Prasad Singh ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 20-06-2023

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 364(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

The allegation against the petitioner along with another is of kidnapping a son and daughter of the informant, who are minor. It is further alleged that the informant received a call from a mobile number and said to send amount of Rs. 50,000/- to his payphone, then he will hand over his both children.

¶15

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. The victims have recovered and their statements recorded u/s 164 of the Cr.P.C., in which they do not

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4278 of 2023(3) dt.20-06-2023 2/2

¶17

whisper about the complicity of this petitioner in respect of commission of abduction. Both the victims children were assaulted by the informant, so both of them left house and boarded on train to go their Nanihal. There is no complaint with regard to physical assault, sexual abuse/misbehave against the petitioner to the victims. The as alleged demand of ransom money has not been executed. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. He is languishing in judicial custody since 04.10.2022.

¶18

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for

¶19

the State.

¶20

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnia in connection with Purnia Sadar P.S. Case No. 748 of 2022.

¶21

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶22

arish/-

¶23

U T

Akhlak @ Md. Akhlak Ansari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akhlak @ Md. Akhlak Ansari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharmendra Ray @ Dharmendra Kumar Bhagwan Vs The State of Bihar

Asif Ahmad @ Asif Mahmood @ Arif @ Diamond Vs the State of Bihar

Anand Pathak @ Shrestha Narayan Pathak Vs The State of Bihar

Lalan Das Vs The State of Bihar

Raj Narayan Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Jha @ Santosh Kumar Jha Vs The State of Bihar