Allowed

Md. Adil @ Md. Aadil v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Aug 2023CR. MISC./30341/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an oral order granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a POCSO and IPC case. The court considered the petitioner's submission that a compromise was reached, noting a prior rejection of bail in an earlier order. The petitioner is released upon surrender with a personal bond.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon surrender/furnishing personal bond to Additional District and Sessions Judge-VII-cum-Special Court POCSO Act, Muzaffarpur, subject to Section 438(2) CrPC conditions.

Md. Adil @ Md. Aadil Vs The State of Bihar — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30341 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2021 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MD. ADIL @ MD. AADIL SON OF MD. MAKSOOD ALAM @ MAKSOOD ALAM @ MD. MAKSOOD R/O VILLAGE- TEHWARA, P.S.KATRA, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance :

¶9

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shanti Bhushan Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Choubey Jawahar, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶11

6 16-08-2023

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶13

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 37 of 2021 registered under Sections 341, 342, 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4/6 of the POCSO Act.

¶14

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected by this Court vide order dated 17.01.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 26896 of 2022. Further submission is that the fresh ground for bail is that both the parties have compromised the present case, as contained in Annexure-4 to the supplementary affidavit.

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30341 of 2023(6) dt.16-08-2023 2/2

¶16

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing personal bond to the satisfaction of Additional District and Sessions Judge-VII-cum-Special Court POCSO Act (West), Muzaffarpur in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 37 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C.

¶17

(Arvind Srivastava, J)

¶18

utkarsh/-

¶19

U T

Md. Adil @ Md. Aadil v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Adil @ Md. Aadil v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Kumar @ Anil Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Bhullu Yadav @ Bhulla Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Mumtaz @ Mohammaed Mumtaz Ali Vs The State of Bihar

Nisha Dubey Vs The State of Bihar

Child in Conflict With Law a Vs the State of Bihar

Brajesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar