This order dismissed a Modification Application filed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.62328 of 2021, ruling that the Court is not inclined to entertain a prayer made in such an application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30123 of 2023
In
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62328 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-18 Year-2017 Thana- MOTIHARI TOWN District- East
Champaran
====================================================== RANJEET KUMAR JHA SON OF PREM KUMAR JHA Resident of- 26 Anugrah Narayan Path, Boring Road, P.S.- Shri Krishna Nagar, DistrictPatna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mohit Raj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ramchandra Sahni, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER
2 10-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
A.P.P. for the State.
In the nature of prayer made in the Modification Application, the Court is not inclined to entertain the same.
The Modification Application is thus rejected.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
GauravSinha/-
U T
Ranjeet Kumar Jha
The State of Bihar
Satyavrat Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
