Allowed

Manish Kumar @ Chhotu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC10 May 2023CR. MISC./17232/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under Bihar Excise Act and IPC. Court granted bail on conditions, including surrender within six weeks and furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on anticipatory bail upon surrender within six weeks by furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties.

Manish Kumar @ Chhotu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17232 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-311 Year-2022 Thana- CHERIYA BARIYARPUR DistrictBegusarai

¶3

====================================================== MANISH KUMAR @ CHHOTU KUMAR S/O NARAYAN PRASAD SINGH @ DEO NARAYAN SINGH R/v- Kanhausi (Kanausi), P.S.Gadhpura, District- Begusarai

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arjun Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 10-05-2023

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶12

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 32 (ii) (iii) and 41(i) (ii) of the Bihar Excise Act and Sections 188, 290 and 120 (B) of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of five cases and allegation is of recovery of 1440.825 liters of liquor recovered from a truck.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not apprehended from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession, it is next submitted that petitioner is neither the owner nor the driver of

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17232 of 2023(2) dt.10-05-2023 2/2

¶16

the truck and his name transpired in the confessional statement of co-accused which does not have any evidentiary value.

¶17

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶18

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Cheriya Bariyarpur in P.S. Case No. 311 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶19

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶20

GauravSinha/-

¶21

U T

Manish Kumar @ Chhotu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manish Kumar @ Chhotu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ravindra Kumar Yadav @ Ravindra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ashok Kumar Kamat Vs The registrar Cooperative Society, Darbhnga Division

Ranjeet Kumar Jha Vs the State of Bihar

Binay Yadav @ Binay Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Idrish Mian @ Idrish Miyan @ Idrish Thakur Vs The Union of India through the Zonal Director Narcotics Control Bureau, Patna Zonal Unit, Patna.