The High Court at Patna dismissed Criminal Miscellaneous No.28247 of 2021 for want of prosecution as no representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated calls.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28247 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-502 Year-2018 Thana- AURANGABAD COMPLAINT CASE District- Aurangabad
======================================================
VIVEK KUMAR S/O LATE RAJU SHARMA @ RAJEEV KUMAR R/O VILLAGE-TUTURAKHI, P.S.-KOCH, DISTRICT-GAYA.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.A.G. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
5 11-10-2023
When the matter was taken up at 10.30 A.M., nobody appeared on behalf of the petitioner and on being repeated call at 12 noon, nobody turned up on behalf of the petitioner to press this application. However, learned counsel for the informant and the State are present.
Accordingly, this application stands dismissed for want of
prosecution.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
brajesh/-
U
VIVEK KUMAR S/O LATE RAJU SHARMA @ RAJEEV KUMAR
THE STATE OF BIHAR
MALA DEVI W/O VIVEK KUMAR
RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
