Disposed

Karan Rajak v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Aug 2023CR. MISC./24989/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought modification of an order granting provisional bail conditional on matrimonial settlement. Parties expressed willingness to live together; the court continued the provisional bail and directed cohabitation, with bail to be confirmed upon the wife reporting resumption of residence.

What did the court decide?

Provisional bail of 18.11.2022 directed to continue, to be confirmed after the opposite party No.2 reports resumed cohabitation.

Karan Rajak Vs The State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24989 of 2023

¶2

¶3

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60273 of 2022

¶4

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-155 Year-2022 Thana- SAHEBPUR KAMAL DistrictBegusarai

¶5

======================================================

¶6

Karan Rajak S/O Shri Khalthu Rajak R/O Village- Govindpur, P.S.- Sahebpur Kamal, Distt- Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Syed Mojibur Rahman, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER

¶12

4 16-08-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and counsel for the Opposite Party No.2 are present.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide

¶14

order dated 18.11.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 60273 of 2022, provisional bail was granted to the petitioner as both the parties are ready to settle the issues and settlement has taken place within 90 days. It was also directed that if no settlement took place, then in that case, provisional bail granted to the petitioner shall be cancelled. Prior to date of settlement, petitioner has filed the present criminal miscellaneous case with a view to modification of order dated 18.11.2022.

¶15

Counsel for the petitioner further submits that he is

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24989 of 2023(4) dt.16-08-2023 2/2

¶17

ready to keep his wife with dignity.

¶18

Counsel for the O.P. No.2 submits that O.P. No.2

¶19

(petitioner’s wife) also wants to live with her husband.

¶20

In this view of the matter, this court hereby directs that the provisional bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 18.11.2022, shall continue and the petitioner is directed to go to the house of the O.P. No.2 and O.P. No.2 is directed to follow her husband (the petitioner).

¶21

It is also directed to O.P. No.2 that she shall file application before the court that both are started residing together, thereafter, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner shall be confirmed.

¶22

With this direction, this writ petition stands disposed of.

¶23

(Dr. Anshuman, J.)

¶24

prakashmani/-

¶25

U T

Karan Rajak v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karan Rajak v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahendra Das @ Mahendra Mochi Vs The State of Bihar

Aradhana Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjeeta Kumari Vs the State of Bihar

Abdul Rashid Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Shankar Prasad Chaudhary and Ors. Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Rupan Rai Vs The State of Bihar