Allowed

Sunil Kumar Sah v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC19 Apr 2023CR. MISC./24746/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order addresses a bail petition for a murder offender held in custody for over three years. The court granted regular bail, directing the petitioner to furnish a bond with two sureties and adhere to specific attendance and cooperation conditions pending trial.

What did the court decide?

Director enlarged on bail subject to furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties and compliance with specific conditions regarding attendance, reporting, and cooperation with investigation.

Sunil Kumar Sah Vs The State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24746 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-271 Year-2019 Thana- KURSAKANTA District- Araria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SUNIL KUMAR SAH S/o- LATE RAM LAL SAH Village- Kursakanta Ward no-10, Po- Kursakanta Ps- Kursakanta Dist- Araria

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mrigendra Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, APP

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 19-04-2023

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶15

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kursakanta P.S. Case No.271/2019, registered for the offence punishable u/s 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

Earlier twice, the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner vide Cr. Misc. No.3696/2021 and Cr. Misc. No.17618/2022 were rejected by this Court. On 11.05.2022, while rejecting Cr. Misc. No.17618 of 2022, observation was given that petitioner may renew his bail prayer after 9 months.

¶17

The petitioner has now filed this application seeking his regular bail.

¶18

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that out of 14 charge sheet witnesses, only seven witnesses have

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24746 of 2023(2) dt.19-04-2023 2/3

¶20

been examined till date, which is also clear from the impugned order itself and petitioner is in custody since 21.10.2019. It is further contended that there is no likelihood of the trial to be taken up in near future and the petitioner has completed more than three years of custody.

¶21

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

¶22

Considering the period of custody of petitioner, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-IInd, Araria, in connection with Kursakanta P.S. Case No.271/2019, subject to the following conditions:

¶23

(1) One of the bailors will be own close relative of the petitioner who will give on affidavit genealogy as to how he is relative to petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner.

¶24

(2) The bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is made accused in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse.

¶25

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24746 of 2023(2) dt.19-04-2023 3/3

¶26

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in the court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

¶27

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded and make himself available and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶28

(5) The petitioner shall appear before the Police Station of his local area in the first week of each month till the disposal of the present case.

¶29

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶30

shikha/-

¶31

U T

Sunil Kumar Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Kumar Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manish Singh @ Manish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shashi Ranjan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Satish Paswan @ Satish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kundan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ravi Ray @ Ravi Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Shiv Kumar @ Shanker Yadav @ Shankar Ray Vs The State of Bihar