Dismissed

Ravi Ray @ Ravi Rai v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC19 Apr 2023CR. MISC./15529/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge High Court order addressed a bail application. After reviewing a trial court report, the court held that the trial could conclude within six months if the defense witnesses are adduced without delay. Consequently, bail was denied, and the trial was directed to wrap up within that period.

What did the court decide?

Bail application dismissed; trial directed to conclude expeditiously within six months.

Ravi Ray @ Ravi Rai Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15529 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-84 Year-2020 Thana- MUSRIGHRARI District- Samastipur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAVI RAY @ RAVI RAI S/O RAM VINOD RAY Resident of VillageHasanpur, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Raj Dular Sah, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 19-04-2023 Heard the parties.

¶12

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Musrigharari P.S. Case No.84 of 2020, registered for the offence punishable u/s 341, 297, 326, 302, 307, 120(B) of the IPC and section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶13

Vide order dated 22.03.2023, a report was called for, regarding the stage of trial. In compliance thereof, a report sent by learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-IX, Samastipur dated 03.04.2023, is kept at flag ‘A’, whereby it is stated that at present, the case is fixed for adducing defence witnesses. On 31.01.2023, the statement of the accused persons u/s 313 Cr.P.C. was recorded and the record was fixed for adducing defence evidence. On 16.02.2023, the defence gave a petition for adducing seven defence witnesses. It is further stated that if the

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15529 of 2023(3) dt.19-04-2023 2/2

¶15

defence adduces their witnesses without any delay, then the trial of this case may be concluded within six months.

¶16

Considering the submissions made in the report, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner named above. The prayer for bail is hereby rejected.

¶17

Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed.

¶18

However, the trial court is directed to conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶19

Both parties are directed to co-operate in the trial.

¶20

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶21

shikha/-

¶22

U T

Ravi Ray @ Ravi Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi Ray @ Ravi Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manish Singh @ Manish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shashi Ranjan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Satish Paswan @ Satish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Kumar Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Kundan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shiv Kumar @ Shanker Yadav @ Shankar Ray Vs The State of Bihar