Allowed

Sawan Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 May 2023CR. MISC./24636/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted regular bail to Sawan Yadav in a case under Section 395 IPC (Dacoity). The petitioner, held in judicial custody since September 22, 2022, was not named in the FIR. The court, inclining to enlarge him on bail due to innocence and lack of antecedents, directed his release on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Direction to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of a like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Bhagalpur.

Sawan Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24636 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-379 Year-2022 Thana- NATHNAGAR District- Bhagalpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sawan Yadav Son Of Tuneshwar Yadav R/O Village- Jankipur, P.S.- Amarpur, District- Banka

... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajive Ranjan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Akhileshwar Dayal ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 22-05-2023

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

As per FIR, the informant alleged that 10-12 unknown miscreants snatched his vehicle loaded with DJ and they also snatched 6000/- rupees and other articles and fled away.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case merely on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused. Neither the petitioner is named in the FIR nor he was put on TIP. He has got no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that nothing looted article has

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24636 of 2023(2) dt.22-05-2023 2/2

¶18

been recovered from his conscious possession. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 22.09.2022.

¶19

Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

¶20

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as custody of the petitioner, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Nath Nagar Madhusudanpur P.S. Case No. 379 of 2022on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Bhagalpur.

¶21

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶22

manishkumar/-

¶23

U T

Sawan Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sawan Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharmendra Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Vicky Kumar @ Vicky Sinha @ Vicky Kumar Sinha Vs The State of Bihar

Abhishek Agrawal @ Abhishek Bhopalka Vs The State of Bihar

Kunal Kumar @ Kunal Kumar Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Saroj Rai Vs the State of Bihar

Munna Sardar Vs The State of Bihar