Allowed

Munna Sardar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 May 2023CR. MISC./21880/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single judge allowed a bail application for the petitioner charged with murder and conspiracy to kill, reasoning that the case relies on suspicion, lacks eyewitnesses, and a similarly situated co-accused has already been granted bail. The petitioner was ordered to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Enlargement of petitioner on bail in connection with Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 81 of 2020 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Munna Sardar Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21880 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2020 Thana- TRIVENIGANJ District- Supaul

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MUNNA SARDAR Son of Late Babu Jee Sardar R/V- Daparkha Ward no. 4, PS- Triveniganj Dist- Supaul

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prafull Chandra Thakur For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 22-05-2023

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State .

¶14

The petitioner has filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

As per allegation in the FIR, it is alleged that the petitioner is indulged in hatching conspiracy to kill the informant’s son namely, Ajay Kumar in connivance with others in the background of monetary dispute.

¶16

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. Neither the informant nor anyone is eye witness of the alleged offence. During course of the investigation, no any consistent material has come against the

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21880 of 2023(2) dt.22-05-2023 2/2

¶18

petitioner which shows his complicity in the alleged offence. The entire prosecution hings around merely on suspicion. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Moreover, similarly situated coaccused namely, Pramila Devi has already been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 29.4.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 17104 of 2023 petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 7.11.2022.

¶19

Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for Bail.

¶20

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner being a lady as well as period of custody, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 81 of 2020 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul.

¶21

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶22

Amandeep/-

¶23

U T

Munna Sardar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Munna Sardar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharmendra Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Vicky Kumar @ Vicky Sinha @ Vicky Kumar Sinha Vs The State of Bihar

Abhishek Agrawal @ Abhishek Bhopalka Vs The State of Bihar

Sawan Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Kunal Kumar @ Kunal Kumar Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Saroj Rai Vs the State of Bihar