Allowed

Radhey Shyam Yadav @ Radheshyam Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC19 May 2023CR. MISC./24602/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allowed a bail application filed by the petitioner facing charges under Sections 420, 406, 409 and 34 of the IPC. The petitioner was directed to be enlarged on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Enlargement on bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar.

Radhey Shyam Yadav @ Radheshyam Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Corruption | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24602 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-355 Year-2022 Thana- BRAHMPUR District- Buxar

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RADHEY SHYAM YADAV @ RADHESHYAM YADAV SON OF BHARAT YADAV R/O VILLAGE- JAWAHI, P.S.- BARHAMPUR, DISTRICT- BUXAR ... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s

¶7

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manindra Kishore Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin, APP ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 19-05-2023

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶11

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Brahmpur P.S. Case no. 355 of 2022 registered under sections 420, 406, 409 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

As per the prosecution case, it is stated by the informant that for the work to be conducted, the estimated amount for the work was Rs. 4,99,900/- against which an advance of Rs. 3 lacs was given to the petitioner and one Ashok Kumar Yadav. Subsequently on measurement it transpired that work to the tune of Rs. 57,377/- only had been done and the accused persons including the petitioner had defalcated a sum of Rs. 2, 42,623/-. As such this FIR.

¶13

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24602 of 2023(2) dt.19-05-2023 2/2

¶15

allegations are false and incorrect. Further co-accused Ashok Kumar Yadav has already deposited the allegedly defalcated amount of Rs. 2,42,623/- which would be evident from the order dated 9.5.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 49173 of 2022 by this Court whereby the said Ashok Kumar Yadav has been granted anticipatory bail. The petitioner is in custody since 21.11.2022 and charge sheet has been submitted in the case. He has no criminal antecedent.

¶16

Heard learned APP for the State.

¶17

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the nature of allegation in the FIR, grant of anticipatory bail to the similarly situated co-accused Ashok Kumar Yadav, the petitioner being in custody since 21.11.2022 and charge sheet having been submitted in the case, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Brahmpur P.S. Case no. 355 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar.

¶18

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶19

Prakash/- U

Radhey Shyam Yadav @ Radheshyam Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Radhey Shyam Yadav @ Radheshyam Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pitambar Kumar Yadav @ Pitambar Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Guddu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Munna Mehta @ Amit Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Mukul Kumar @ Mukul Rai @ Mukul Kumar Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Anul Khan @ Anul Miyan @ Ainul Khan Vs The State of Bihar

MD Aftab Alam @ Pappu Vs The State of Bihar