Allowed

Munna Mehta @ Amit Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC18 May 2023CR. MISC./22576/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought regular bail in a criminal case involving attempted murder and rioting. The Court observed that no overt act was alleged against the accused who has been in custody since December 2022 with no criminal antecedents, and granted bail.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Munna Mehta @ Amit Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22576 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-322 Year-2022 Thana- JADIA District- Supaul

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MUNNA MEHTA @ AMIT KUMAR S/O RAM NARAYAN MEHTA R/O VILLAGE- KORIAPATTI(WEST), WARD NO. 12, P.S- JADIA, DISTT.SUPAUL.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Harish Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 18-05-2023 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶11

The petitioner has preferred this application for

¶12

grant of regular bail in connection with Jadia P.S. Case no.322 of 2022 registered under sections 307, 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 341, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶13

As per the prosecution case, it is stated by the informant that being annoyed over the informant having married the girl from the family of the accused, the six named accused persons along with 15-20 accused persons entered the house of the informant. It is stated that on the orders of Anupam Mehta, Sarvesh Kumar resorted to fire from his gun as a result of which the informant sustained gunshot injury in his chest.

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22576 of 2023(2) dt.18-05-2023 2/2

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The cause of false implication of the petitioner is evident from the F.I.R. itself. No overt act has been alleged against this petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 12.12.2022 and chargesheet has been submitted in the case.

¶16

Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶17

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the nature of allegation in the F.I.R. against the petitioner wherein no overt act has been alleged against him, the petitioner being in custody since 12.12.2022, chargesheet having been submitted in the case and the petitioner not having any criminal antecedent, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Jadia P.S. Case no.322 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul.

¶18

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶19

Saurabh/-

¶20

U T

Munna Mehta @ Amit Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Munna Mehta @ Amit Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vinod Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Manraj Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Jag Raj Singh @ Jug Raj Singh Vs the Union of India

Pitambar Kumar Yadav @ Pitambar Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Guddu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Prasad Vs The State of Bihar