Disposed

Vikki Maya @ Vikki Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC7 Feb 2023CR. MISC./23598/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Husband sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 498A IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act alleging torture over dowry demands. The court granted anticipatory bail with conditions including monthly payment of Rs.5,000 to the informant and liberty for mediation.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on furnishing Rs.25,000 bond with two like sureties, conditional on paying informant Rs.5,000 per month.

Vikki Maya @ Vikki Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23598 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2021 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Nalanda

¶3

======================================================

¶4

VIKKI MAYA @ VIKKI KUMAR Son of Jatadhari Sharma Resident of Uma Kunj, Bhootnath Road, Ward No.- 46, P. N. Singh Gali, P.S.- Agamkuan, District - Patna.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Khushboo Kumari @ Ishu Kumari Daughter of Prakash Vishwakarma Resident of Village - Paharpura, P.S.- Islampur, District - Nalanda.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shantanu Kumar, APP For the Informant : Mr.Awadhesh Prasad, Adv. Mr.Kumar Mrityunjay Narain, Adv. ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶12

4 07-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable u/s 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶14

Petitioner, who is husband of informant, is said to have tortured the informant in association of his family members over non-fulfillment of dowry demand.

¶15

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is an innocent person and has committed no offence. Petitioner has neither made any dowry demand nor

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23598 of 2022(4) dt.07-02-2023 2/3

¶17

tormented her over the demand of dowry. It is submitted that informant herself does not want to reside with the petitioner. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar , reported in 2006 (3) PLJR 182 .

¶18

In that view of the matter, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Nalanda Mahila P.S. Case No.29 of 2021, G.R. No.1008 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶19

Petitioner is ready to pay Rs.5000.00 (Rupees Five Thousand) per month to the informant in the second week of every month. If the petitioner fails to pay the aforesaid amount on two consecutive months, informant shall be at liberty to move before the learned Court below for cancelling the bail bond of the petitioner.

¶20

It goes without saying that the aforesaid payment shall be subject to any order being passed in matrimonial maintenance

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23598 of 2022(4) dt.07-02-2023 3/3

¶22

case or any other collateral proceedings.

¶23

Learned Court below is directed to issue notice to informant/O.P. No.2 for furnishing her bank account details. If she fails to furnish the same, the aforesaid amount will be deposited in the learned Court below which will be released in favour of the informant after she furnishes her bank account details.

¶24

If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the learned Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Center for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement.

¶25

With the aforesaid observation and direction, this application stands disposed of.

¶26

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶27

pallavi/-

¶28

U T

Vikki Maya @ Vikki Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikki Maya @ Vikki Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Shamshad Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Mohammad Shakil @ Md. Sakil Vs The State of Bihar

Leela Kant Rai Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ramji Prasad @ Ramjee Chauhan, Vs The State Of Bihar

Naresh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Vinod Kumar Jha, Vs The State of Bihar