The bail application was declared infructuous because the petitioner had already been arrested during the pendency of the application, rendering further hearing unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22471 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-61 Year-2023 Thana- BASANTPUR District- Siwan
======================================================
NITIN KUMAR, SON OF NARAYAN SAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGEMADARPUR, PS- LAKDI NAVIGANJ, OP DISTT- SIWAN
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bijay Prakash Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Kanhaiya Kishore (App100) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 19-04-2023 It has been informed by learned counsel for the petitioner that during the pendency of this bail application petitioner has been arrested and now the present bail application has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the present bail application stands consigned.
(Purnendu Singh, J)
sanjeev/-
U
Nitin Kumar, Son of Narayan Sah
The State of Bihar
Purnendu Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
