Petitioners in a civil writ petition sought permission to withdraw the application. The single-judge bench granted permission and dismissed the writ application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18907 of 2018
======================================================
Versus
Patna High Court CWJC No.18907 of 2018(2) dt.02-05-2023 2/2
Kumarkhand, District Madhepura.
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kameshwar Prasad Gupta, GP-10 Mr. Satya Vrat, AC to GP-10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER
2 02-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ application.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the writ application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Kundan/-
U
Parwati Devi
The State of Bihar
The District Magistrate, Madhepura
Satyavrat Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
