Allowed

Sunil Yadav @ Sunil Kumar Vidyarthi v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Apr 2023CR. MISC./21623/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous petition for bail, the Patna High Court allowed the petitioner's application for regular bail in connection with offences under the IPC arising from a police station case, imposing specific conditions regarding trial appearance, kinship of sureties, and abstention from further criminal activity.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 30,000 with two sureties subject to conditions including physical appearance, affidavit of relationship, and no further criminal activity.

Sunil Yadav @ Sunil Kumar Vidyarthi Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21623 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-276 Year-2022 Thana- KHARHAGPUR District- Munger

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sunil Yadav @ Sunil Kumar Vidyarthi Son of Late Singheshwar Yadav, Resident of Village - Pashchim Ajimganj, P.S. - Kharagpur, Distt. - Munger

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Suman Kumar Mishra, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 05-04-2023

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶12

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with S. Tr. No. 362 of 2022 arising out of Kharagpur P.S. Case No. 276 of 2022, dated 09.06.2022, lodged under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 337/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 08.12.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 51706 of 2022 this Court had rejected the bail application of petitioner merely on technical ground that suppression has been made in disclosing about pendency of the criminal case.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to misinformation, wrong averments have been mentioned in paragraph no.3 of the earlier bail application. He further submits

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21623 of 2023(2) dt.05-04-2023 2/3

¶16

that as per prosecution case, the allegation of attack on the informant is there in the F.I.R. on pity issues when he was returning after taking medicine for his mother and allegation of assault by three persons including the petitioner are there. It is alleged that they are trying to cut in the different part of the victim by virtue of blade, due to which bleeding started.

¶17

Learned counsel submits that from the injury report, it transpires that the injury was made from hard and blunt substances. He further submits that petitioner is in custody since 26.06.2022 having 3 criminal cases pending against him, in which, he is on bail. He also submits that charge sheet has already been filed in this case.

¶18

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for

¶19

bail.

¶20

In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, let the petitioner above named, be granted bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District & Sessions JudgeIII, Munger in connection with S.Tr. No. 362 of 2022 arising out of Kharagpur P.S. Case No. 276 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C. with

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21623 of 2023(2) dt.05-04-2023 3/3

¶22

other following conditions:

¶23

A. The petitioner shall support in trial and shall appear physically before the lower court on each and every date fixed, in case of non-appearance for two consecutive dates without sufficient cause, shall be resulted into cancellation of his bail bond.

¶24

B. One of the bailors shall be close relative who shall file an affidavit before the court about his relationship with the petitioner.

¶25

C. The petitioner shall file an affidavit at the time of furnishing of bail bond that he shall not involve in such criminal activity during the continuance of present bail bond, violation of this condition shall be resulted into cancellation of his present bail bond.

¶26

With this observation, the bail application stands allowed.

¶27

(Dr. Anshuman, J.)

¶28

ritik/-

¶29

U T

Sunil Yadav @ Sunil Kumar Vidyarthi v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Yadav @ Sunil Kumar Vidyarthi v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saba Hasib Vs the State of Bihar

Ramanand Sha Vs the State of Bihar through Director General of Police Patna, Bihar

Pravin Kumar Vs the State of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Bihar

Dharmendra Sah @ Dharmendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sabri Das @ Sabri Kumari Vs the State of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

Satendra Manjhi @ Sakindra Manjhi @ Satyendra Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar