Allowed

Dhiraj Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Jun 2023CR. MISC./20756/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving charges of dacoity and carrying arms, directing his release on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each.

Dhiraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20756 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-441 Year-2022 Thana- PAROO District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Dhiraj Kumar Son Of Harendra Mahto Resident Of Village - Sarmastpur, P.S.Paroo, District - Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Nachiketa Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nagendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 24-06-2023

¶11

The defects, as pointed out by the Office is

¶12

hereby ignored.

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶14

learned APP for the State.

¶15

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections

¶16

399, 400 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

¶17

As per prosecution case, informant alleged that

¶18

on getting secret information he along with police party

¶19

reached Kamalpura Chowk and apprehended five accused persons along with this petitioner and during

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20756 of 2023(2) dt.24-06-2023 2/3

¶21

search from this petitioner a loaded pistol and three mobiles were recovered.

¶22

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

¶23

the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner denies that any incriminating article has been recovered from his possession. The petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 14.09.2022. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶24

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

¶25

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as judicial custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Paroo P.S. Case No. 441 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of

¶26

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20756 of 2023(2) dt.24-06-2023 3/3

¶27

the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

¶28

Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class, Muzaffarpur(West).

¶29

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶30

Shageer/-

¶31

U T

Dhiraj Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhiraj Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kaliya Mahto @ Raju Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Musarraf @ Mubarak Hussain Vs the State of Bihar

Chandan Chaudhary @ Chandan Kumar Chaudhary @ Chandan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Raju Kumar @ Rajiv Kumar @ Raju Vs The State of Bihar

MD Sahid Vs The State of Bihar