Allowed

Raju Kumar @ Rajiv Kumar @ Raju v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Jun 2023CR. MISC./14325/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous matter, the High Court of Patna granted bail to the petitioner, who was in custody forfive years of alleged offenses under the IPC and Arms Act, by fixing a bail bond amount and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail with bonds of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate.

Raju Kumar @ Rajiv Kumar @ Raju Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14325 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-9 Year-2022 Thana- DULHIN BAZAR District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Raju Kumar @ Rajiv Kumar @ Raju Son Of Rajendra Singh @ Nand Kumar Singh R/O Vill.- Sabazpura, P.S.- Dulhin Bazar, Distt.- Patna

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rakesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Narendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR

¶7

ORAL ORDER

¶8

3 24-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶9

learned APP for the State.

¶10

The petitioner is languishing in custody in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 302, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶11

As per the F.I.R, the informant has alleged that

¶12

all the accused persons assembled and started her husband assaulting by means of stick and lathi. The further specific allegation against Sanju Kumar @

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14325 of 2023(3) dt.24-06-2023 2/3

¶14

Sanjeet, Ajeet Kumar and Subhash who are alleged to have shot injuries to her husband, who succumbed to his injuries on the spot itself.

¶15

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. The specific accusation of shot fire is against Sanju Kumar, Ajeet Kumar and Subham. Moreover, other co-accused have been granted bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 11.08.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 25490 of 2022. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 30.09.2022.

¶16

Considering the facts aforesaid and the period under custody, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/(Ten Thousands) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class, Danapur, Patna in connection with Dulhin Bazar

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14325 of 2023(3) dt.24-06-2023 3/3

¶18

P.S. Case No. 09 of 2022.

¶19

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶20

Shageer/-

¶21

U T

Raju Kumar @ Rajiv Kumar @ Raju v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raju Kumar @ Rajiv Kumar @ Raju v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kaliya Mahto @ Raju Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Musarraf @ Mubarak Hussain Vs the State of Bihar

Chandan Chaudhary @ Chandan Kumar Chaudhary @ Chandan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Dhiraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

MD Sahid Vs The State of Bihar