Allowed

Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Ranjan @ Karu v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Apr 2023CR. MISC./2072/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner, who was falsely implicated in a shooting case. The court was inclined to release him on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, considering the lack of consistent material against him and his custody duration.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was directed to be released on regular bail by furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Ranjan @ Karu Vs The State of… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2072 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-115 Year-2022 Thana- JAKKANPUR District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAVI KUMAR @ RAVI RANJAN @ KARU S/o Pramod Rai R/o MohallaVigrahpur, In Front Of Devisthan, P.S.- Jakkanpur, Distt- Patna.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajeev Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shantanu Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶8

3 21-04-2023

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶10

APP for the State.

¶11

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 393, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of Arms Act.

¶12

As per prosecution case, the informant being manger of Amul Milk at Enterprises Murali Compound, Karbighahiya, alleged that on 3.3.2022 at about 7:50PM, while he was at office, the accused persons came there and fired on him due to which he sustained injury. It is further alleged that they committed loot in his office.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. The petitioner is not named in FIR rather he has falsely been

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2072 of 2023(3) dt.21-04-2023 2/2

¶15

implicated in this case. The petitioner has not been put on TI Parade and his name has surfaced in this case on the basis of his self confessional statement. It is further submitted that during investigation, this fact came into light the the firing has been made by co-accused namely, Nishu Kumar and nothing consistent material has come against this petitioner. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 23.5.2022.

¶16

Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

¶17

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as custody of the petitioner, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Jakkanpur P.S. Case No. 115 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.D.J.-XI, Patna.

¶18

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶19

Amandeep/-

¶20

U T

Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Ranjan @ Karu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Ranjan @ Karu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raju Ali Vs The State of Bihar

Suderson Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shintu Kumar @ Shintu Sah @ Situ Kumar Sah Vs the State of Bihar

Ram @ Ramu Chaudhary @ Ramu Kumar Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Gopal Sah @ Gopal Sah (Goand) Vs The State of Bihar

Bhawesh Kumar Khan @ Bhavesh Kumar Khan Vs The State of Bihar