Allowed

Ram @ Ramu Chaudhary @ Ramu Kumar Choudhary v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Apr 2023CR. MISC./2030/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under Section 366A IPC, the High Court of Judicature at Patna inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The court directed release upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties of similar amounts.

What did the court decide?

Directed to be released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of like amount.

Ram @ Ramu Chaudhary @ Ramu Kumar Choudhary Vs… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2030 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-42 Year-2021 Thana- KASIMBAZAR District- Munger

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAM @ RAMU CHAUDHARY @ RAMU KUMAR CHOUDHARY Son of Late Raj Kumar Chaudhary R/v- Chhoti Mirjapur, Gas Agency, P.S.- Kashim Bazar, District- Munger

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Subesh Sharma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shyam Bihari Singh ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 21-04-2023

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 366A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

The prosecution case, in brief, is that the informant alleged that her daughter, aged about 14 years, has been kidnapped by the accused persons including the petitioner on the pretext of solemnization of marriage.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. The victim girl was recovered and her statement has been

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2030 of 2023(3) dt.21-04-2023 2/2

¶17

recorded under section 164 of Cr.P.C., annexed with Case diary, wherein, she did not support the prosecution version and stated that she went from her home out of her own sweet will. She further stated that she solemnized marriage with this petitioner in a temple of Delhi. It is also submitted that good sense has been prevailed between the parties and in support of this, Annexure-2 has been annexed with this petitioner. Moreover, petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 25.10.2022.

¶18

Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

¶19

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as custody of the petitioner, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Kasim Bazar P.S. Case No. 42 of 2021 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate at Munger.

¶20

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶21

Amandeep/-

¶22

U T

Ram @ Ramu Chaudhary @ Ramu Kumar Choudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram @ Ramu Chaudhary @ Ramu Kumar Choudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raju Ali Vs The State of Bihar

Suderson Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shintu Kumar @ Shintu Sah @ Situ Kumar Sah Vs the State of Bihar

Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Ranjan @ Karu Vs The State of Bihar

Gopal Sah @ Gopal Sah (Goand) Vs The State of Bihar

Bhawesh Kumar Khan @ Bhavesh Kumar Khan Vs The State of Bihar