The petitioner's counsel reported the absence of instructions and current case status. The High Court dismissed the application in the absence of instruction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20601 of 2011
======================================================
MAHATMA SATYOGANAND JI
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR and ORS
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Jitendra Narain Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nitya Nand App ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is not able to give the current status of the case also he has not instruction in the matter.
In view of the above, this application is dismissed.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Sunnykr/-
U
Mahatma Satyoganand Ji
The State of Bihar and Ors
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
