Petitioner applied under Section 482 CrPC to quash summons issued under Section 138 NI Act. Court dismissed the application finding no reason to interfere with the impugned order and directed removal of defects.
Application for quashing dismissed; petitioner directed to remove defects.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2058 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1335 Year-2019 Thana- EAST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- East Champaran
======================================================
SANJAY KUMAR Son of Shiv Shankar Prasad @ Shiv Shankar Gupta Resident of Village - Raghunathpur P.S. - Raghunathpur (O.P.), Dist. - East Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shyam Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
2 14-09-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within
one month.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2058 of 2022(2) dt.14-09-2023 2/2
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
HR/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there is any reason to interfere with the impugned order issuing summons under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sanjay Kumar
The State of Bihar
Abdul Kalam
Nawneet Kumar Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
