Dismissed

Shishupal Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC14 Sept 2023CR. MISC./1923/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a quashing petition under Section 482 CrPC, the High Court upheld the rejection of the petitioner's discharge petition. An oral order directed removal of defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter and dismissed the application maintaining the trial court's order.

What did the court decide?

Application seeking quashing of the impugned order rejected. Petitioner directed to remove defects within one month.

Shishupal Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Quashing and FIR | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1923 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-66 Year-2021 Thana- WARISLIGANJ District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SHISHUPAL SINGH Son of Late Harikant Singh @ Karu Singh Resident of Village- Mafi, P.S.- Warisaliganj, District- Nawada.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Deepak Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Amitesh Kumar ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 14-09-2023

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.

¶14

The present application has been preferred by the petitioner under Section 482 of the CrPC for quashing the order dated 10.12.2021 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge-XI, Nawada in Sessions Trial No. 292 of 2021 arising out of Warsiliganj P.S.Case No. 66 of 2021, whereby the petition for discharge filed by the petitioner has been rejected.

¶15

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that initially the FIR was lodged under Section 365 of the IPC against unknown, but after recovery of the dead-body of deceased, Section 302 and other allied Sections of the

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1923 of 2022(2) dt.14-09-2023 2/2

¶17

IPC were added. Co-accused Bhola Singh was arrested and in his confessional statement the name of the petitioner has figured. He has submitted further that, during investigation, except the confessional statement of co-accused, there is nothing against the petitioner and without applying its judicial mind, the learned court below has rejected the petition under Section 227 of the CrPC filed by the petitioner for his discharge.

¶18

It is settled principle that even strong suspicion is enough for framing of charge.

¶19

I do not find any reason to interfere with the order passed by the learned court below.

¶20

The application is accordingly dismissed.

¶21

Office shall ensure that all the defects are removed

¶22

by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

¶23

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶24

HR/-

¶25

U T

Shishupal Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shishupal Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Goswami Vs The State of Bihar

Govinda Kumar @ Govinda Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Jafar Alam @ Jafar Vs The State of Bihar

Shivam Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Rewat Paswan Vs The State of Bihar