Allowed

Shyamdeep Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC22 May 2023CR. MISC./19848/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application in a Bettiah riot and arson case under multiple IPC sections. The petitioner was not named in the FIR, was in custody since August 2022, and a co-accused had been granted bail. Considering facts, circumstances and period of custody, the court enlarged him on bail.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000 with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the court concerned, Bettiah, West Champaran.

Shyamdeep Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19848 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-460 Year-2022 Thana- BETTIAH CITY District- West

¶3

Champaran

¶4

====================================================== Shyamdeep Kumar, Son Of Suresh Das, R/O Village- Tikuliya, P.S.Chanpatiya, District- West Champaran

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Gauri Shankar Thakur, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶8

2 22-05-2023

¶9

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode.

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

¶11

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Bettiah (T) P.S. Case No. 460 of 2022 dated 18.06.2022 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 338, 395, 427, 435, 412, 120B, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is accused of being part of the mob which had tried to commit arson and riot.

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19848 of 2023(2) dt.22-05-2023 2/2

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The co-accused person has already been granted bail by the Coordinate Bench of this court vide order dated 04.03.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 673 of 2023. The petitioner is accused in four other criminal cases as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 11.08.2022.

¶15

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of bail petition of the petitioner.

¶16

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Bettiah (T) P.S. Case No. 460 of 2022.

¶17

The application stands allowed.

¶18

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶19

Gautam/-

¶20

U T

Shyamdeep Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shyamdeep Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Aashif @ Md. Aashiph Vs the State of Bihar

Ashish Kumar Gupta @ Ashish Vs The State of Bihar

Anil Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Dheeraj Dube @ Dheeraj Kumar Dubey Vs the State of Bihar

Vikash Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar