Allowed

Upendra Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC12 May 2023CR. MISC./17250/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted bail to the petitioner, Upendra Yadav, accused under IPC sections 272, 273, 414/34 and Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act Section 30(a). Directed him to execute a bond with sureties before the Additional Sessions Judge.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be enlarged on bail on executing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each before the learned Additional Sessions Judge II-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Madhubani.

Upendra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17250 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-482 Year-2022 Thana- JAYNAGAR District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

UPENDRA YADAV Son of Uttam Yadav Resident of Village - Korahiya Nav Toli, P.S.- Jaynagar, District - Madhubani.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shailendra Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar

¶10

======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 12-05-2023

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶14

APP for the State.

¶15

The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 272, 273 and 414/34 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶16

Prosecution case relates to recovery of 1530 litres of illicit liquor from 11 motorcycles.

¶17

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has no concern with the alleged recovery or with the vehicle in question. Neither the petitioner was arrested on spot nor any incriminating article has been recovered from his conscious possession. He is languishing in judicial custody

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17250 of 2023(2) dt.12-05-2023 2/2

¶19

since 25.1.2023.

¶20

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

¶21

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge II-cum-Specail Judge, Excise Act, Madhubani in connection with Jaynagar P.S. Case No. 482 of 2022.

¶22

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶23

sushma/-

¶24

Upendra Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Upendra Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jhunna Mishra Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Khurshid Alam @ Md. Khurshid @ Khurshid Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Vishwajeet Saha @ Bishwajeet Saha Vs The State of Bihar

Surendra Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjeet Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Akash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar