Bail application in a Siwan district criminal case; petitioner sought permission to withdraw the application, and the court consigned it to record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18201 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2020 Thana- NAUTAN District- Siwan
======================================================
Jaiprakash Pathak, S/O Late Kisundev Pathak, Resident of village Pachalkhi Pandey Tola, P.S. Nautan, District Siwan, Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Priyadarshi Pankaj Raj Anand, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ajit Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER
Heard Mr. Priyadarshi Pankaj Raj Anand, learned
counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned APP for the State.
(Purnendu Singh, J)
chn/-
U
Jaiprakash Pathak
The State of Bihar
Purnendu Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
