Allowed

Sanjay Kumar Sah @ Sanjay Sah @ Sanjay Singhaniya v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC7 Nov 2023CR. MISC./17744/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused of offences under the IPC and Arms Act involving recovery of a pistol and motorcycle, directing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties under specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted bail on bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount under conditions of trial cooperation, presence in court, and non-interference with evidence/witnesses.

Sanjay Kumar Sah @ Sanjay Sah @ Sanjay Singhaniya Vs The State of… — Corruption | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17744 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-225 Year-2022 Thana- BABUBARHI District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SANJAY KUMAR SAH @ SANJAY SAH @ SANJAY SINGHANIYA Son of Ramaprit Sahu Resident of Village - Korahiya, P.S.- Jaynagar, District - Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Subhash Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Harendra Prasad ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

7 07-11-2023

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner has filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 413, 414 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

¶13

The prosecution case relates to recovery of one country made loaded pistol with five live cartridges, mobile phone and one motorcycle from the possession of the petitioner.

¶14

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in the present case by the police due to local village politics and previous criminal antecedent. The

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17744 of 2023(7) dt.07-11-2023 2/3

¶16

petitioner has no concern with alleged recovery of arms and motorcycle. In fact, on the date of occurrence petitioner was going towards his relatives place but he was caught by the police party forcibly and taken his signature on some plain paper. This case is triable by the court of Judicial Magistrate. It is further submitted that petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 28.09.2022.

¶17

Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for Bail.

¶18

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Babubarhi P.S. Case No. 225 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-I, Madhubani on following conditions:-

¶19

(1) The petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every fixed date and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17744 of 2023(7) dt.07-11-2023 3/3

¶21

(ii) If the petitioner tamper with the evidence or

¶22

threaten the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶23

(iii) In case, the petitioner repeats offence of similar nature after enlargement on bail, his bail-bond will be cancelled by the Court below.

¶24

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶25

lata/-

¶26

U T

Sanjay Kumar Sah @ Sanjay Sah @ Sanjay Singhaniya v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Kumar Sah @ Sanjay Sah @ Sanjay Singhaniya v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rohit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Akash Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Pappu Ram Vs the State of Bihar

Pankaj Kumar Chaudhary @ Pankaj Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Shri Anil Baitha @ Anil Kumar Baitha @ Anil Baitha @ Anil Chaudhary Vs the CBI Office of the Head of Branch Special Crime Branch, Dr. S.K. Singh Path, Bailey Road.

Chhoto Mishra @ Chandan Mishra Vs the State of Bihar