Allowed

Arvind Kumar Sahni @ Arbind Kumar Sahni v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC1 Nov 2023CR. MISC./17399/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application by an accused charged under various penal provisions for assaulting the informant, cutting his penis and neck with a blade, and snatching cash. The court noted custody since 12.11.2022 and absence of criminal antecedents, and granted bail.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount before ACJM, Samastipur.

Arvind Kumar Sahni @ Arbind Kumar Sahni Vs the… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17399 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-476 Year-2022 Thana- SAMASTIPUR MUFFASIL DistrictSamastipur

¶3

====================================================== Arvind Kumar Sahni @ Arbind Kumar Sahni S/O Devnarayan Choudhary @ Dev Narayan Sahni Resident Of Village-Suratpur, P.S.-Muffasil (Samastipur), District-Samastipur

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sharda Nand Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rajesh Kumar ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶9

6 01-11-2023

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶11

learned A.P.P appearing on behalf of the State.

¶12

The petitioner is languishing in custody in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 326, 307, 379, 34, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

It is alleged that the accused persons assaulted

¶14

the informant, snatched cash of Rs. 1.20 lakhs and cut his penis and neck by blade, as a result of which, he

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17399 of 2023(6) dt.01-11-2023 2/3

¶16

sustained injuries.

¶17

It is submitted by learned counsel for the

¶18

petitioner that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. For the alleged occurrence of 12.10.2022, the F.I.R was registered on 22.10.2022 without explaining the delay. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R and his name subsequently sprang up in the re-statement of the informant. There is contradiction in the re-statement and fardbeyan of the informant and the specific allegation is not against the petitioner. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 12.11.2022. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶19

Considering the facts aforesaid and the period under custody, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/(Ten Thousands) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in connection with

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17399 of 2023(6) dt.01-11-2023 3/3

¶21

Muffasil(Samastipur) P.S. Case No. 476 of 2022.

¶22

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶23

Shageer/-

¶24

U T

Arvind Kumar Sahni @ Arbind Kumar Sahni v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arvind Kumar Sahni @ Arbind Kumar Sahni v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranjan Singh @ Mama Vs The State of Bihar

Munna Das Vs The State of Bihar

Mahendra Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar

Sanichar Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar

Ajit Kumar @ Ajit Rai @ Chhotu Vs The State of Bihar

Shyam Yadav @ Shyam Kumar Vs the State of Bihar