Allowed

Subodh Singh @ Subodh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Sept 2023CR. MISC./17256/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous matter, the High Court of Patna granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in an FIR alleging offences including attempted rape and snatching before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali, subject to six-week compliance.

What did the court decide?

Enlarged on bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of like amount to CJM Vaishali within six weeks.

Subodh Singh @ Subodh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17256 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2876 Year-2018 Thana- VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE District- Vaishali

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Subodh Singh @ Subodh Kumar Son of Hari Singh Resident of VillageHarpur Kasturi, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, Distt.- Vaishali.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

Kanchan Devi Wife of Reet Lal Manjhi, Daughter of Ramchandra Manjhi Resident of Village- Haribanspur, P.S.- Bhawanpur, Distt.- Vaishali.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

======================================================

¶11

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ranjeet Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nand Kishore Prasad ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶13

3 08-09-2023 Despite valid service of notice, no one appears on

¶14

behalf of opposite party no. 2.

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶16

State.

¶17

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 354(B), 379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶18

As per the prosecution case, petitioner is alleged to have attempted to commit rape with the complainant. It is further alleged that petitioner also snatched Mangalsutra worth Rs. 10,000/-.

¶19

It is submitted that petitioner has been falsely

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17256 of 2023(3) dt.08-09-2023 2/2

¶21

implicated in this case due to village politics. No such occurrence as alleged in the complaint has ever taken place. On the alleged date and time of occurrence petitioner was not present, as he was working in Muzaffarpur in a private company. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.

¶22

Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Complaint Case No. 2876 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶23

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶24

vinita/- U T

Subodh Singh @ Subodh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subodh Singh @ Subodh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjeet Kumar @ Sanjit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Alaudin Mansuri Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Pravesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shiv Nath Sahni Vs the State of Bihar

Jay Prakash Sarraf @ Munna Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Amanullah @ Raja Vs The State of Bihar