Anticipatory bail application in a case involving alleged sexual intercourse with a minor procured on the pretext of marriage; the court considered the nature of the accusation and refused anticipatory bail.
Anticipatory bail rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15832 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-195 Year-2022 Thana- JANKINAGAR District- Purnia
======================================================
Jay Prakash Sarraf @ Munna S/O Prem Lal Sarraf @ Premlal Sarraf Resident of Village- Jankinagar Lalji Mandal Tola, P.S.- Jankinagar, District- Purnea.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Md Fazle Karim For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rana Randhir Singh ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
4 08-09-2023 Heard both parties.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15832 of 2023(4) dt.08-09-2023 2/2
inclined to enlarge the petitioner above-named on anticipatory
bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
vinita/- U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted anticipatory bail for offences under Sections 376, 120(B) IPC and Sections 4/16 POCSO Act.
4 provisions across 2 enactments
Jay Prakash Sarraf @ Munna S/O Prem Lal Sarraf
The State Of Bihar
Prabhat Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
