Petitioners filed a quashing application regarding a criminal complaint. One respondent's counsel withdrew the application, leading to its dismissal.
The quashing application is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17176 of 2016
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-171 Year-1999 Thana- AURANGABAD COMPLAINT CASE District- Aurangabad
======================================================
1 Sanjay Prasad, S/o Late Bhuneshwar Prasad, residents of MohallaKasera Toli, Daudnagar, P.S.- Daudnagar, District- Aurangabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Parties
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajiv Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
ORAL ORDER
Heard Mr. Rajiv Kumar, learned counsel
appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17176 of 2016(4) dt.13-09-2023 2/2
dismissed as withdrawn.
(Purnendu Singh, J)
pravinkumar/-
U T
Sanjay Prasad
Subhash Prasad
Kishori Prasad
Vinod Prasad
The State of Bihar
Kanti Kuer
PURNENDU SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
