Petitioner in Criminal Miscellaneous Application sought permission to withdraw the application. The High Court allowed the withdrawal in oral order and dismissed the application accordingly.
Permission to withdraw the application allowed; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16627 of 2016
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2000 Thana- BARH District- Patna
======================================================
Mostt. Sunita Devi
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sinha,Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rabindra Prasad Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr.Ajit Kumar, APP ======================================================
3 13-09-2023
appearing on behalf of the petitioner; Mr. Rabindra Prasad Singh, learned counsel for O.P.no.2 and Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned APP for the State.
petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present application.
(Purnendu Singh, J)
chn/-
U
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sunita Devi
The State Of Bihar
Purnendu Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
