The High Court at Patna heard a criminal miscellaneous application. The learned counsel for the petitioner sought and was granted permission to withdraw the application, which was consequently dismissed.
Permission to withdraw the application was granted; the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14998 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-325 Year-2018 Thana- ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE District-
Rohtas
======================================================
GUPTESHWAR PRASAD GUPTA Son of Late Bifan Sah Resident of Village - Hurka, P.S.- Tilouthu, District- Rohtas
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Fahimuddin ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 21-04-2023 Heard the parties.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission
and is permitted to withdraw this application.
Accordingly, this application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-
U
Gupteshwar Prasad Gupta
The State of Bihar
Sandhya Kumari
Jawahar Prasad Gupta
Rituraj Bahadur
Birjraj Bahadur
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
