Quashed

Mr. Aseesh Munish v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Apr 2023CR. MISC./6658/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 498-A, and 34 of the IPC against the petitioner. The court held that with the达成 of a compromise between the parties regarding dowry torture and harassment allegations, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the litigation pending.

What did the court decide?

The F.I.R. of Mahila P.S. Case No. 108 of 2021 registered for offences punishable under Sections 323, 498-A and 34 of IPC is quashed against all accused persons.

Mr. Aseesh Munish Vs The State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6658 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2021 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

MR. ASEESH MUNISH

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Apurv Harsh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Umesh Lal Verma ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 20-04-2023 Heard Mr. Apurv Harsh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Saket Tiwary, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party.

¶13

This application has been filed for quashing of the First information Report filed by the Opposite Party no.2 being Mahila P.S Case no. 108 of 2021 dated 05.09.2021 against the petitioner's u/s 323, 498 A and 34 of IPC since a compromise has been reached out between the Petitioner no.3 and the Opposite Party No.2.

¶14

The prosecution story in short is that the informant was married on 30.01.2015 with the petitioner. Soon after the marriage, she went to her matrimonial home where she was subjected to torture and harassment due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry. Thereafter, the informant went with the

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6658 of 2023(2) dt.20-04-2023 2/2

¶16

petitioner to Noida at his workplace. After few days, the informant went to her in-law’s house at Ranchi and a baby was born out of the wedlock on 20.04.2017 and again she was tortured at her matrimonial house for dowry and she was ousted her from the house. The petitioner is not ready to keep his wife and the baby.

¶17

In view of the settlement between the parties, no useful purpose will be served by keeping the litigation pending. The F.I.R. of Mahila P.S. Case No. 108 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323/498-A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code is quashed against all the accused persons.

¶18

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶19

Saif/-

¶20

U T

Mr. Aseesh Munish v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. Aseesh Munish v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manoj Mahto @ Manoj Kumar Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar Through Its Principal Secretary Govt .of Bihar ,patna and Ors.

Ram Swarath Thakur Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary Government Of Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Dr. Dirgha Narayan Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary,deptt. Of Home, Bihar and Ors.

Pawan Yadav @ Pawan Kumar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar, Through The Secretary, Home Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Arun Singh Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna and

Bibhuti Narayan Singh Vs The State of Bihar