Allowed
Sonelal Sah @ Sane Lal Sah @ Veermani v. The State of Bihar
Patna HCCR. MISC./14151/2023
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14151 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2022 Thana- JALALPUR District- Saran
======================================================
SONELAL SAH @ SANE LAL SAH @ VEERMANI Son of Lakshman Sah R/v- Badaki Sawari, P.S.- Jalalpur, District- Saran at Chapra
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shrinath Manjhi For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Uday Chand Prasad
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
3 19-09-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14151 of 2023(3) dt.19-09-2023 2/2
amount of Rs. 3,000/- (three thousand) per month, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-XIII, Saran at Chapra in connection with Jalalpur P.S. Case No. 11/ 2022 on the following conditions:
(i.) Informant would file an affidavit before the court below and bring on record her Saving bank account number for its communication to the petitioner.
(ii.) Petitioner would deposit the aforesaid maintenance amount per month in the Saving bank account of the Informant.
(iii.) In case, the petitioner fails to deposit the maintenance amount for two consecutive months, the court below would be at liberty to cancel the bail bond.
(iv.) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present, as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
BKS/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is eligible for bail in a case involving IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act offences?
SONELAL SAH @ SANE LAL SAH @ VEERMANI
The State of Bihar
SWITI KUMARI
PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court