Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a case alleging defalcation of Rs. 7,03,587 of government funds allotted under Mukhyamantri Seven Nischay Yojana, for offences under Sections 406, 420 and 120(B) IPC. Counsel argued the work was completed but unmeasured; the State opposed. Anticipatory bail was refused.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5907 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2022 Thana- SHAMBHUGANJ District- Banka
======================================================
VIVEKANAND THAKUR Son of Late Bimlanand Thakur Resident of Village- Jhakhara, P.S.- Shambhuganj, District- Banka
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Mukherjee, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta, A.P.P. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
5 18-09-2023
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5907 of 2023(5) dt.18-09-2023 2/2
against the petitioner of misappropriating the Government money which was allotted under Mukhyamantri Seven Nischay
Yojana.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Navya/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to a petitioner accused of misappropriating government funds under Mukhyamantri Seven Nischay Yojana.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Vivekanand Thakur
The State of Bihar
Prabhat Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
