Disposed

Jayant Roy v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC12 Jul 2023CR. MISC./10743/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought quashing of a Patna magistrate's cognizance order under Sections 420/34 IPC arising from a complaint by the opposite party. With parties consenting to arbitration of their dispute, the High Court appointed a retired judge as arbitrator and quashed the cognizance order against all petitioners.

What did the court decide?

Cognizance order dated 20.11.2021 quashed against all petitioners; matter referred to arbitration with retired Judge Shyam Kishore Sharma as arbitrator.

Jayant Roy Vs The State of Bihar — Quashing and FIR | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10743 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5599 Year-2019 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

JAYANT ROY S/O KAUSHLENDRA ROY Resident of B.J. 98, 2nd Floor, Near Jaspal Kaur Public School, Shalimar Bagh (West), North West, P.S.Shalimar Bagh, New Delhi- 110088

¶5

Shobha Roy W/o Kaushlendra Roy Resident of B.J. 98, 2nd Floor, Near Jaspal Kaur Public School, Shalimar Bagh (West), North West, P.S.Shalimar Bagh, New Delhi- 110088

¶6

Equipworks Private Limited Having its corporate Office at flat no. 33A, BG1,Near Jaspal Kaur Public School, Shalimar Bagh (West), North West, P.S.Shalimar Bagh, New Delhi- 110088 both are represented through its one of the Director Jayant Roy, S/o Kaushlendra Roy, resident of B.J. 98, 2nd Floor, Near Jaspal Kaur Public School, Shalimar Bagh (West), North West, P.S.- Shalimar Bagh, New Delhi- 110088

¶7

M/s Ergotel Private limited Having its Kaushlendra Roy, having its office at flat no. 33A, BG- 1, Near Jaspal Kaur Public School, Shalimar Bagh (West), North West, P.S.- Shalimar Bagh, New Delhi- 110088. Both the companies are represented through its one of the Director Jayant Roy, S/o Kaushlendra Roy, resident of B.J. 98, 2nd Floor, Near Jaspal Kaur Public School, Shalimar Bagh (West), North West, P.S.- Shalimar Bagh, New Delhi110088

¶8

... ... Petitioner/s

¶9

Versus

¶10

The State of Bihar

¶11

Rajeev Kumar S/o Late Dineshwar Thakur Resident of Baranti, P.S.Bidupur, District- Vaishali, presently residing at Flat No. 110, Sector- E, Pocket-II, Vasant Kunj, South West, New Delhi- 110070

¶12

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhishek Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A.G ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶14

5 12-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶15

This application has been filed for quashing the order dated 20.11.2021 by which Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-XII, Patna has taken cognizance against the

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10743 of 2022(5) dt.12-07-2023 2/3

¶17

petitioners in Complaint Case No. 5599 (c) of 2019 registered for the offence under Section 420 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶18

3 As per prosecution, opposite party no. 2 filed a complaint petition in the court of Ld. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna. It is further alleged that KSSIPL is the company in which accused no. 1 and opposite party no. 2 are directors, petitioners no. 3 & 4, a private limited company registered office at Delhi. The opposite party no. 2 also stays in Delhi. The petitioner no. 1 and 2 are also resident of Delhi. Petitioner no. 2 is a private limited company having its registered office at Delhi. No transaction has taken place at Patna. The petitioner no. 1 and 2 have been made accused only on the basis of blood relation with the accused no. 1.

¶19

Both the parties have agreed to end their dispute and they have submitted that the matter be referred to the arbitration.

¶20

Both the parties have further submitted that they are resident of Delhi and arbitration may be directed to be held in Delhi. In view of the consent of the parties and their prayer, this matter is referred to arbitration.

¶21

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Shyam Kishore Sharma, a

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10743 of 2022(5) dt.12-07-2023 3/3

¶23

retired Judge of Patna High Court is appointed as an Arbitrator in this case.

¶24

In view of above, this application is disposed of.

¶25

The order dated 20.11.2021 by which Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-XII, Patna has taken cognizance in Complaint Case No. 5599 (c) of 2019 is hereby quashed against all the petitioners.

¶26

Let a copy of the order be communicated to Hon’ble Mr. Justice Shyam Kishore Sharma at the address given below forthwith.

¶27

“ Hon’ble Mr. Justice Shyam Kishore Sharma, Library No. 2, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi- 110001 Resi. Cum Off. 161, Swarup Sadan Apartment, Pocket-4, Sec-13, Dwarka, New Delhi- 110078. (Mobile- 9871141854, Phone No.-011-7967106.

¶28

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶29

Ranjeet/-

¶30

U T

Jayant Roy v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jayant Roy v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Miraj Master@ Meraj Ahmad @ Md. Miraj Vs The State of Bihar

Navin Chandra Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Sandip Kumar Thakur @ Sandip Thakur @ Sandeep Kumar Thakur Vs The State of Bihar through Vigilance.

Surya Nand Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Nishi Sinha Vs The State of Bihar

Deepak Kumar Srivastva @ Deepu Kumar Srivastva Vs The State of Bihar