Allowed

Nitesh Kumar @ Nitish Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Nov 2023CR. MISC./10713/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court allowed the petitioner's application for regular bail in a case involving offences under the IPC, including rape and assault, directing his release after the framing of charges upon furnishing a bail bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail after framing of charge by furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Nitesh Kumar @ Nitish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10713 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-425 Year-2022 Thana- MINAPUR District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

NITESH KUMAR @ NITISH KUMAR Son of Late Shivnath Ray R/vPipraha, P.S.- Minapur, District- Muzaffarpur

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Santosh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Syed Ehteshamuddin ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

6 08-11-2023

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

¶12

counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case

¶14

registered for the offence punishable under sections341, 323, 452, 354(A), 304, 354(B), 376, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

As per prosecution case, the informant alleged that at night of 20.8.2022 the petitioner entered into her house and committed rape with her. Again, he also committed rape on 21.8.2022. It is also alleged that on 21.8.2022, panchayati was held but during conversation, the petitioner along with others started assaulting and abusing the informant/victim.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. There is land dispute between the parties and with intention to capture

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10713 of 2023(6) dt.08-11-2023 2/3

¶18

the land of the petitioner, he has falsely been implicated in this case by the informant. It is further submitted that the allegation against the petitioner to commit rape with the victim on 20.8.2022 but subsequently, the FIR was not registered. It is said that on the next day on 21.8.2022, the petitioner again committed rape with the victim thereafter, the FIR was lodged on 22.8.2022. The delay of lodging FIR creates doubt on the prosecution case. From perusal of para-24 of the case diary, it appears the victim declined for the medication examination but ultimately, on 24.8.2022 medical was conducted and doctor opined no spermatozoa was was present. It is also submitted that the victim/informant is a married and matured lady. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. It is further submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 23.8.2022.

¶19

Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

¶20

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as custody of the petitioner, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail after framing of charge, if not framed in

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10713 of 2023(6) dt.08-11-2023 3/3

¶22

connection with Minapur P.S. Case No. 425 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.

¶23

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶24

amandeep/-

¶25

Nitesh Kumar @ Nitish Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nitesh Kumar @ Nitish Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pankaj Kumar Chaudhary @ Pankaj Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Shri Anil Baitha @ Anil Kumar Baitha @ Anil Baitha @ Anil Chaudhary Vs the CBI Office of the Head of Branch Special Crime Branch, Dr. S.K. Singh Path, Bailey Road.

Sanjay Kumar Sah @ Sanjay Sah @ Sanjay Singhaniya Vs The State of Bihar

Vakil Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Suresh Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Manindra @ Manindra Mishra Vs The State of Bihar