Allowed

Subodh Yadav @ Dr. Prof. Subodh Prasad Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC14 Mar 2023CR. MISC./10325/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application arising from a murder and arms offence, the Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner. The release is conditional upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties, cooperation in trial, and verification of criminal antecedents without delay.

What did the court decide?

Release of petitioner on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Subodh Yadav @ Dr. Prof. Subodh Prasad Yadav Vs The State… — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10325 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2020 Thana- BIHARIGANJ District- Madhepura

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Subodh Yadav @ Dr. Prof. Subodh Prasad Yadav son of Sri Satyanarayan Yadav Resident of Village - Kusthan, P.S. Bihariganj, District - Madhepura.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ===================	... ... Opposite Party/s ===================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Informant : For the Opposite Party/s : ===================	Mr. Ajay Thakur Mr. Shivam, Advocates Mrs. Priya Gupta Mr. Lokesh Kumar, Advocates Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ===================================
CORAM: HONOURABL	E MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶8

12 14-03-2023

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Informant and learned APP for the State.

¶10

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶11

The prosecution case, in short, is that on 20.02.2020 at about 6:15 P.M. the informant and his elder brother Vinod Kumar Agrawal were talking in front of their fertilizer shop. In the meanwhile, three criminals namely Subodh Yadav, Shiv Narayan Yadav and Arun Yadav, armed with weapon, came there on a motorcycle and opened fire upon Vinod Kumar

¶12

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10325 of 2022(12) dt.14-03-2023 2/4

¶13

Agrawal. One of the bullets hit on panjara of informant’s brother causing his death on the spot.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner carries three more cases other than the present one and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that it appears from the F.I.R. that there is general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons including the petitioner. He further submits that the police after investigation submitted final form in favour of the petitioner on 31.12.2020.

¶15

The learned Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class, Udakishunganj differed with the final form dated 31.12.2020 and issued process against the petitioner vide order dated 06.04.2021.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that before lodging the present F.I.R. the inquest report was prepared and the copy of the F.I.R. was sent to learned Magistrate on 22.02.2020 but the present F.I.R. was instituted on 20.02.2020. He further submits that during investigation only on the basis of CDR report the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and in fact the informant is not the eye witness of the alleged occurrence and the petitioner is in

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10325 of 2022(12) dt.14-03-2023 3/4

¶18

custody since 14.12.2021.

¶19

Learned counsel for the informant as per instruction does not oppose the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶20

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Bihariganj P.S. Case No. 49 of 2020, with the following conditions :-

¶21

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

¶22

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶23

(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10325 of 2022(12) dt.14-03-2023 4/4

¶25

cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

¶26

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

¶27

Ibrar//-

¶28

U T

Subodh Yadav @ Dr. Prof. Subodh Prasad Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subodh Yadav @ Dr. Prof. Subodh Prasad Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vishnu Kant Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Yogendra Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Indrapal Tiwary @ Dablu Tiwary Vs The State of Bihar

Wasim Mian @ Wasim Miya @ Wasim Akhtar Vs The State of Bihar

Nitish Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Manjay Ram @ Manjesh Ram Vs The State of Bihar