Allowed

Yogendra Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC13 Mar 2023CR. MISC./44321/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court granted bail to the petitioner accused in a dowry death case, noting that prosecution material suggested the deceased committed suicide. The order deferred the bail order to the lower court until the charge was framed or the accused was kept in custody if not released immediately.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount, subject to conditions of cooperation in trial, no tampering, and antecedent verification without delay.

Yogendra Yadav Vs the State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44321 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-354 Year-2021 Thana- SHIVSAGAR District- Rohtas

¶3

======================================================

¶4

YOGENDRA YADAV S/O JAGARNATH YADAV @ JAGARNATH SINGH Resident of village- Konar, P.S.- Sheosagar, District- Rohtas

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, Sr. Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, APP For the Informant : Mr. Babu Nandan Prasad, Adv. ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶10

4 13-03-2023

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶12

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

According to prosecution case, the allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other co-accused persons committed murder of the daughter of the informant due to nonfulfillment of the demand of dowry.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the the petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner is husband of the deceased. He further submits that it appears from the F.I.R. that

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44321 of 2022(4) dt.13-03-2023 2/3

¶16

there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. There is no specific allegation of any assault or overt act against the petitioner. He further submits that during investigation, it has come that the deceased has committed suicide herself. During investigation, paragraph no. 31, 32 and 33 of the case diary, it has come that the deceased has committed suicide herself and the police after investigation submitted the charge sheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 09.12.2021.

¶17

The learned counsel for the informant as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State on the other hand vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submit that there is sufficient material against the petitioner.

¶18

Vide order dated 01.02.2023 a report was called for with regard to the stage of the trial. Report dated 14.02.2023 reveals that at present the record is fixed for appearance of the accused person namely, Jaganath Singh. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the report, the trial is not likely to be completed in near future and the petitioner is in custody since 09.12.2021.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail, after framing of

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44321 of 2022(4) dt.13-03-2023 3/3

¶21

charge if not framed, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Shivsagar P.S. Case No. 354 of 2021, subject to the following conditions:-

¶22

1. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

¶23

2. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶24

3. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

¶25

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

¶26

amit/-

¶27

U T

Yogendra Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yogendra Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arvind Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Arvind Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Banty Mian @ Sabir Ansari Vs The State of Bihar

Vishnu Kant Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Indrapal Tiwary @ Dablu Tiwary Vs The State of Bihar

Belal Khan Vs The State of Bihar