Appeal not contested by appellants; court closed the 1996 appeal with liberty to seek restoration on pending issues.
Appeal closed; liberty to seek restoration if pending issues exist.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.924 of 1996
======================================================
JAI NANDAN JHA and ORS
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR and ORS
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Shailesh Kumar Sinha, SC-5 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
4 03-11-2023 None appears for the appellants. Earlier also when the matter was posted on 27.09.2023 and 16.10.2023, there was no appearance on behalf of the appellants.
(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)
( Partha Sarthy, J)
Anushka/-
U
Jai Nandan Jha and Ors
State of Bihar and Ors
K. Vinod Chandran
Partha Sarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
