A 1995 Letters Patent Appeal listed before the Patna High Court; counsel reported no instructions, so the bench closed the appeal with liberty to seek restoration if any issue remains pending.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.1302 of 1995
======================================================
BHOLA MAHTO and ORS
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR and ORS
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Bishwa Nath Chaudhary, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Subodh Kr. Sinha, SC-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
4 03-11-2023 Learned counsel for the appellants submits that there is no instruction in the matter.
(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)
( Partha Sarthy, J)
Anushka/-
U
Bhola Mahto and Ors
The State of Bihar and Ors
K. Vinod Chandran
Partha Sarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
