Letters Patent Appeal arising from a civil review concerning the appellant and State of Bihar respondents was dismissed as withdrawn at the counsel's request, having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.6 of 2019
In
CIVIL REVIEW No.295 of 2016
======================================================
Sahdeo Prasad Sahaj Son of Late Rameshwar Prasad Yadav R/V- Banauli, P.s. - haveli Kharagpur, Distt. Munger.
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr.Surya Narayan Sah, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Alok Ranjan, AC to AAG-5
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
appellant, present appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn having become infructuous.
(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)
( Madhuresh Prasad, J)
Sujit/- U
Sahdeo Prasad Sah
The State of Bihar
The Deputy Development Commissioner, Munger
The Sub Divisional Officer, Sub-Division-Munger
The Block Development Officer, Block-Dharhara
Sadanand Yadav
K. Vinod Chandran
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
