Single judge order dismissing a writ application as withdrawn. Counsel for petitioners informed the court that the case has become infructuous, leading to dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2124 of 2023
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prasoon Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vivek Prasad, GP-7
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
to withdraw this application as the same has become infructuous.
Writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)
( Madhuresh Prasad, J)
Sumit/Shashank- U
M/s Rai Construction a partnership firm
The State of Bihar through Commissioner of Commercial/ State Tax Bihar, Patna
The Joint Commissioner of Commercial Tax/ State Tax, Patna Central Circle
The Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes/ State Tax, Patna Central Circle, Patna
The Regional Officer, NH M.O.R.T.H, Patna (Bihar)
The Exeutive Engineer, NH Division, Gaya
HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
MADHURESH PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
