Allowed restoration of Second Appeal No. 235 of 2008 which was deemed incompetent due to non-substitution of heirs and legal representatives of respondent no. 2.
Restoration of Second Appeal No. 235 of 2008 to its original file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2527 of 2016
In SECOND APPEAL No.235 of 2008
======================================================
Dwarika Sharan Mahto
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
Radha Ram and Ors.
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr.Mohammed Abu Haidar Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
This application has been filed for restoration of Second Appeal No. 235 of 2008 which has become incompetent for non-substitution of heirs and legal representatives of respondent no. 2.
For the reasons mentioned in this application, it is allowed and Second Appeal No. 235 of 2008 is restored to its original file.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
BT/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Second Appeal No. 235 of 2008 should be restored given it had become incompetent.
Dwarika Sharan Mahto
Radha Ram and Ors.
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
