Disposed

Dr. Anjishnu Prakash v. Bijendra Kumar Brajesh

Patna HC20 Sept 2022C.Misc./551/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an oral order where the High Court of Judicature at Patna, in Civil Miscellaneous Application No.551 of 2022, directed the Sub Judge, Patna, to dispose of a pending eviction suit filed in 2015 as early as possible due to delay and delay in disposal.

What did the court decide?

Suit pending before Sub Judge XIV, Patna, No.106 of 2015, to be disposed of as early as possible.

Dr. Anjishnu Prakash Vs Bijendra Kumar Brajesh — Landlord and Tenant | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.551 of 2022

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Dr. Anjishnu Prakash Son of Dr. Ayodhya Prasad Singh, resident of M.I.G. House No. 43, Lohia Nagar, Kankarbagh Colony, P.S. Kankarbagh, Town and District Patna.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

Bijendra Kumar Brajesh son of Ram Bhajan Prasad, Prop. Kalyani Shringar, House No. 143/B, P.C. Colony, Lohia Nagar, Kankarbagh Colony, P.S. Kankarbagh, Town and District Patna.

¶7

... ... Respondent/s

¶8

======================================================

¶9

Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Nagadeo Choubey For the Respondent/s : Mr. ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 20-09-2022

¶13

The limited prayer of the petitioner in this Civil Miscellaneous application is that the petitioner has filed a Suit for eviction on the ground of personal necessity and default in payment of rent and the learned trial court may be directed to dispose of the suit expeditiously.

¶14

The Suit was filed by the petitioner in the year 2015 bearing Eviction Suit No. 106 of 2015.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Suit has been filed in the year 2015. Learned counsel next submits that the last plaintiff’s witness has been examined in the Suit. Accordingly, submission is that a direction be issued to the trial court to dispose of the Suit as early as

¶16

Patna High Court C.Misc. No.551 of 2022(2) dt.20-09-2022 2/2

¶17

possible.

¶18

Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the fact that the Suit is for eviction and the same is pending for the last seven years in that view of the matter the learned trial court i.e. Sub judge XIV, Patna is directed to dispose of the Suit as early as possible in accordance with law within a reasonable time frame.

¶19

This Civil Miscellaneous application stands disposed of.

¶20

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)

¶21

praful/-

¶22

Dr. Anjishnu Prakash v. Bijendra Kumar Brajesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Anjishnu Prakash v. Bijendra Kumar Brajesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Chandra Sahu and Anr. Vs Sumiran Sahu and Ors.

In the Goods of Late Kalyani Bala Sinha Vs x

Ranjeet Singh @ Rana Singh @ Rana Ji Vs Surendra Kumar Singh and Ors.

Ravindra Kumar Vs Ramji Singh

Jagdish Yadav Vs Sudama Devi and Ors.

Tripti Narayan Jha Vs Indra Nath Sharan @ Amrendra Kumar