Jalo Kumar v. Priti Kumari
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged the Family Court's order granting interim maintenance to his wife under Section 125 Cr.P.C. The High Court found the fixed amount reasonable and dismissed the application.
What did the court decide?
Application stands dismissed; interim maintenance order of the Family Court is upheld.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.104 of 2020
======================================================
Jalo Kumar S/o Suresh Prasad Yadav Resident of Village-Kaithvan Tand P.S. Kaihvan Tand, District-Munger.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
Priti Kumari D/o Lakhan Kumar Yadav Resident of Village-Shiv Nagar P.S. Piri Bazar, District Lakhsarai.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar Pandey, Advocate Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Raju, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
3 28-06-2022 Heard Mr. Vijay Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for
the petitioner and Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Raju, learned counsel for the Respondent.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the quantum of interim maintenance fixed by the Family Court is excessive and warrants setting aside.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Jalo Kumar S/o Suresh Prasad Yadav
- respondent
Priti Kumari D/o Lakhan Kumar Yadav
Coram
Anil Kumar Sinha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court