Single judge oral order allowing withdrawal of a civil miscellaneous application No.134 of 2020, effectively dismissing the matter as withdrawn; counsel stated the matter became infructuous.
Permission granted to withdraw the application; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.134 of 2020
======================================================
Ranjit Rai @ Ranjit Kumar, Son of Sri Sarifan Rai @ Sarif Rai, Resident of Hathiya Kandh Sarai, P.S.-Sahpur, District-Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Neeraj Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
Mr. Neeraj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that during pendency of this application, the same has become infructuous.
Accordingly, he seeks permission to withdraw the
same.
Permission is granted.
The instant application stands dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
perwez
U
Ranjit Rai
Nand Kishore Prasad
Poonam Devi
Sahdeo Prasad
Manju Kumari
Gaurav Kumar
Anil Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
