Disposed

Rajo Devi v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC23 Jun 2022CWJC/9329/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order directed the trial Court to dispose of a pending Right of Disability case within three months, proceeded ex parte against non-cooperation, and maintained status quo before dismissing the writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Directing disposal of Right of Disability Case No. 01 of 2021 within three months under ex parte provisions if parties do not cooperate, and maintaining status quo.

Rajo Devi Vs The State of Bihar — Writ and Judicial Review | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9329 of 2020

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Rajo Devi W/o Pradeep Kumar Choudhary resident of Village- Nirmali, Ward No. 05, P.S. and Post- Nirmali, District- Supaul.

¶4

Sri Ram Narayan Purve S/o Late Moti Purve resident of Village- Nirmali, Ward No. 05, P.S. and Post- Nirmali, District- Supaul.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar through Principle Secretary Land Reforms Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Commissioner, Persons with disabilities Social Welfare Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.

¶9

The District Magistrate Cum Collector, Supaul.

¶10

¶11

¶12

The Additional Collector, Supaul.

¶13

The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Nirmali, District- Supaul.

¶14

The Sub- Divisional Officer, Nirmali, District- Supaul.

¶15

The Circle Officer, Nirmali, District- Supaul.

¶16

Baidyanath Sah S/o Mahkhan Sah.

¶17

Nirmal Sah S/o Baidyanath Sah.

¶18

Both are resident of Village - Nirmali, Ward No. 05, P.S. and Post-

¶19

Nirmali, District- Supaul.

¶20

... ... Respondents

¶21

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Dubey, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Asif Kalim, A.C. to AAG-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶22

3 23-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶23

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that he will be satisfied if Right of Disability Case No. 01 of 2021 pending in the Court of Additional District Judge-cum-Special Judge, Supaul, filed by the petitioners under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 may be

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.9329 of 2020(3) dt.23-06-2022 2/2

¶25

directed to be disposed of at the earliest as the same is pending at the instance of respondent no.9.

¶26

Accordingly, the Additional District Judge-cumSpecial Judge, Supaul, is directed to dispose of Right of Disability Case No. 01 of 2021 within a period of three months from today.

¶27

If either of the parties does not cooperate in the disposal of the matter then the Court below shall proceed ex parte against non-cooperating party and decide the issue in question.

¶28

During the pendency of the case in the Court, the status quo shall be maintained by the parties.

¶29

With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition is disposed of.

¶30

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶31

pawan/-

¶32

Rajo Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajo Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pankaj Kumar Ray Vs The State of Bihar through Mr. Anjani Kumar

Suresh Thakur Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Mahanth Bharat Das Vs Panchdeo Tiwari

Baiju Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Nityanand Pandit Vs The State of Bihar

Ramdev Sharma Vs The Union of India